Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2010-103
Original file (2010-103.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
 

 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

Application for the Correction of 
the Coast Guard Record of: 

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

FINAL DECISION 
BCMR Docket No. 2010-103 

 

SUMMARY OF THE RECORD 

The applicant asked the Board to correct her discharge form DD 214 to show in block 12.a. that 
she entered active duty on July 1, 2002, when she became a cadet at the Coast Guard Academy, and to 
include her 4 years as a cadet in the calculation of her total service in block 12.c.  Her DD 214 currently 
shows  that  she  entered  active  duty  upon  her  commissioning  on  May  17,  2006,  and  that  she  had 
accumulated just 1 year, 6 months, and 13 days of active duty upon her discharge on November 29, 2007.   
 
 
The Coast Guard recommended that the Board deny relief, stating that under Article 12.C.16.a.5. 
of the Personnel Manual and COMDTINST M1900.4D, the instruction manual for completing DD 214s, 
an  officer’s  time  attending  a  Service  Academy  may  not  be  counted  in  computing  the  length  of  the 
officer’s service for any purpose and so is not reflected on a DD 214. 
 

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS  

Article 12.C.16.a.5. of the Personnel Manual states that “[s]ervice time while attending a Service 
Academy  may  not  be  counted  in  computing,  for  any  purpose,  the  length  of  service  of  an  officer.”  
COMDTINST  M1900.4D  states  with  regard  to  the  net  active  service  entry  in  block  12.c.  that  “service 
while  attending  a  Service  Academy  as  a  cadet  is  creditable  for  enlisted  members  reverted  to  enlisted 
status,  but  in  no  case  is  it  creditable  for  a  member  commissioned  as  an  officer.”    Therefore,  the  Board 
agrees  with  the  Coast  Guard  that  the  entries  in  blocks  12.a.  and  12.c.  on  the  applicant’s  DD  214  are 
correct and no change is warranted.  Accordingly, her request should be denied. 
 

ORDER 

The  application  of  former  Ensign  xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  USCG,  for  correction  of  her  military 

record is denied.     

  
 

 

 

 
 

October 21, 2010 
 
Date 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 
 
 Philip B. Busch 
 

 

 
 Paul B. Oman 

 

 

 
 Dorothy J. Ulmer 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2012-123

    Original file (2012-123.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    § 182(b) and (c)(1), a cadet who does not complete the course of instruction at the Coast Guard Academy may be transferred to the Reserve and “order[ed] to active duty for such period of time as the Secretary prescribes (but not to exceed four years).” Summary of Past Actions Month Sept. 2007 July 2009 June 2010 Feb. 2012 Action Enlisted for 6 years of active duty Discharged (DD 214) and reenlisted for 2 years Discharged (DD 214) and appointed a cadet Disenrolled, discharged (DD 214),...

  • CG | BCMR | Retirement Cases | 2010-040

    Original file (2010-040.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    • • • On April 24, 1995, the applicant enlisted in the Coast Guard Reserve. of the Pay Manual, COMDTINST M7220.29B, states that creditable service for pay purposes includes “all periods of active duty inactive service … in any Regular or Reserve component.” However, Chapter 2.B.4.a. However, the 1995 RATMAN defines an “anniversary year” as extending “from the date of entry or reen- try to the day preceding the anniversary of entry or reentry” and the 1997 RPM states that a reservist’s...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2010-017

    Original file (2010-017.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. On the applicant’s DD 214, block 4.a. The instructions in the manual state that, for enlisted personnel, block 11 should contain only the entry “NA.” The PSC pointed out that a member’s military education is properly shown in block 14 of a DD 214 and alleged that the applicant’s completion of 30 weeks of Electronics Technician School is...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2008-095

    Original file (2008-095.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because entering information in block 11 for an enlisted member would violate the regulation, CGPC recommended that the Board deny the applicant’s request. Enter all course titles, number of weeks, and year completed, from the date entered in block 12a through the date entered in block 12b. With the notation “NA” and many Xes, block 11 of the applicant’s DD 214 is properly prepared in accordance with Chapters 1.E.

  • CG | BCMR | Retirement Cases | 2011-226

    Original file (2011-226.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. The veteran’s military records show that the veteran was born male and served in the Coast Guard with a male name.1 The applicant alleged that she is the veteran and that a State court has legally changed her name to the female name shown in the case caption. Furthermore, it should be noted that records of former service members are filed...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2010-260

    Original file (2010-260.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her allegations, the applicant submitted a copy of a Coast Guard Reserve identification card, which was issued to her on August 19, 2004, and which shows that she was a PO2 (petty officer, second class) in pay grade E-5. An application to the Board must be filed within three years after the applicant discovers, or reasonably should have discovered, the alleged error in her record.1 Although the applicant claimed that she discovered the alleged error in June 2010, she must have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022557

    Original file (20100022557.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the length of service her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be recalculated to include the time he spent as a cadet at the U.S. Military Academy (USMA). In this section, the term "service as a cadet or midshipman" means service as a cadet at the USMA, U.S. Air Force Academy, or U.S. Coast Guard Academy; or service as a midshipman at the U.S. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 971(b)(2), in effect at the time, stated that no commissioned officer of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019479

    Original file (20140019479.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests her time spent at the United States Military Academy (USMA) be added to her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 16 October 2001. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * transcripts from the USMA CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-5 provides for entries on the DD Form 214 for a Soldier who is released in a cadet status prior to graduating from the USMA.

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2010-259

    Original file (2010-259.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. applicant qualified as a boat3 crewmember on April 29, 1980, there are no documents in his record indicating that he ever served sea duty or received sea pay.4 Upon his discharge on November 26, 1980, the applicant signed his DD 214, showing zero sea service, as well as an Administrative Remarks page noting that he had “completed 00 years, 00...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2010-197

    Original file (2010-197.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD 214 shows that he had 2 years, 1 month, and 17 days of total active service, with a note that the service “includes midshipman service from 30 Jun 69 to 16 Aug 71.” Subsequently, on June 20, 1974, the applicant was discharged from his enlisted status to accept a Naval Reserve commission. However, the alleged error should have been discovered when he received his April 24, 1998 retirement points statement because it shows that he was not given credit for his time at the Naval Academy. ...